SIGN UP

HERE

Kicking America Out of the Counting Room

If you’re going to steal an election, you need to keep those opposed to your plan from seeing what you are doing.

A -

Machines.  You can’t see inside a closed box.

• All computer experts agree: the beginning of a computer forensics investigation is gaining access to the computer logs.

• But officials refuse to release those logs.
• And, intentional conduct by election officials in blue-state strongholds involves intentionally trying to destroy an audit trail for the machines. ​

• Machines in Detroit were improperly connected by ethernet cords allowing for someone to receive direct updates on all machine activity.

• Private vendors gain unauthorized and improper access to machines allowing for manipulation of the machine count.

• Hard drive taken home in GA.

B -

Prevent People Who Do Not Support Your Candidates from Being Able to See What is Happening in the Counting Centers.

• State Officials Claim the Unprecedented Consolidation of Counting Centers was Necessary Due to COVID.  In other words, we must create a crowd to prevent the spread of COVID.

• Creating huge counting centers in the urban core in the key swing states had not happened before.  State officials claim this was necessary due to COVID, however, this consolidation also allowed two other things to take place.​

• The use of dropboxes and consolidated counting centers breached the chain of custody of ballots and allowed and justified the infusion of hundreds of thousands of ballots into counting centers controlled by one political party.
• • Urban election clerks have, thus far, refused to produce logs revealing who picked up the hundreds of thousands of ballots from dropboxes, the dates and times the ballots were removed, who transported the ballots and whether there were any stops along the way.  Moreover, all urban election officials apparently failed to implement a two-person per dropbox key policy requiring members of both political parties to transport the ballots in order to maintain a proper chain of custody of the ballot preventing ballots dumping and/or ballot replacement. These failings constitute a significant breach in the election system such that the election’s as operated could not be certified under federal law.

• The large physical structure, in Detroit more than two football fields in size, allowed democrat election officials to claim a republican was in the “place” of the curing and counting despite the republican’s inability to actually see the curing and counting of ballots.

• Every state requires representatives from both major political parties to be present to observe the counting and “curing” of ballots.

• “Curing” involves election officials actually fixing ballots so that they may be counted.  In Michigan, for example, election “inspectors” review ballots which the optical scanner counting machines are unable to read due to damage to the ballot, coffee stains, and for military ballots since the paper on which the ballots were printed would clog the machine.  Investigators then take those ballots they claim were “flawed” and remove them from the counting stream.  The investigators then look at the “flawed” ballots and fill out by hand new ballots that they cast, claiming the new ballot reflects the intent of the voter of the “flawed” ballot.  In other words, the “inspectors” actually cast and count ballots for third parties who are not present.
• In Detroit, there were more than 130 ballot “curing” tables. The law requires representatives of both political parties to be at the table so they can see the process and then sign off on that process. Republicans were not allowed at the tables in Detroit.
• Work stoppages were used to clear counting centers of poll watchers (link to stories). Stopping the count while not allowing access to the ballots previously counted allows a fraudster to calculate the votes required to alter the outcome of the election. The 2020 election included counting stops in all urban centers in the key swing states.
• In Detroit, Democrat election officials claimed they could not locate a sufficient number of Republicans to participate in the process despite this list of Republicans who said they volunteered to assist and were rejected.

C -

Violating or side-stepping state law.

Blue state officials allowed local election officials in Democrat strongholds to violate state laws protecting ballot integrity. For example:

• In Wisconsin, the Secretary of State ordered election officials to allow hundreds of thousands of ballots to be counted which did not comply with the state’s voter identification laws.
• In Pennsylvania, Democrat officials improperly “cured” absentee ballots while Republican counties complied with the law and did not count these ballots. The Pennsylvania Secretary of State, under pressure to appear fair, issued an order the night before the election for all county clerks to engage in such “curing,” however, election clerks in Republican counties refused to violate the law and also complained they did not have the resources to engage in such action.
• A Democrat city worker in Detroit blew the whistle on Detroit election officials. JJ, in a sworn statement, revealed that she and other election workers were coached on how to cheat and ordered to backdate ballots received after the statutory deadline so that invalid ballots would be counted.

D -

Running Out the Clock

• Urban election officials are behaving similar to a football team that gained an advantage from a questionable play. They are now running up to the line of scrimmage to begin the next play before America can throw the red flag on the field to demand a closer look.

• The presidential electors, according to federal statute, must be seated by December 8 and vote on December 14. These deadlines, however, are not necessary for the effective transition of power, and should not interfere with state legislatures investigating the management of the election, especially when we experienced unprecedented manipulation of election rules calling into question hundreds of thousands of ballots

• The only deadline set by the Constitution is noon on January 20.

​​

• Urban election officials are refusing to allow access to ballots, ballot envelopes, surveillance video of counting centers, video of loading docks and receiving docks, dropbox logs, or video of dropbox locations.

• Forensic examination of the ballots is necessary to determine the validity of the ballots. An enormous amount of information is available from examining ballots.
• Surveillance video has already revealed fraudulent ballots being counted in Atlanta and video surveillance and GPS information is available to corroborate sworn testimony by US Postal Service employees and subcontractors that hundreds of thousands of ballots were moved across state lines. Thus far, officials have refused to release any of this evidence.

1

Access to our poll books allows election thieves to enter false identities directly into the official voter rolls. In several states, private activist organizations, such as the left-leaning Rock The Vote, were allowed to input voter information directly into government databases.

• Data available from both public records, such as the national change-of-address registry, as well as black market sources on the dark web, provide everything fraudsters need to create new voter identities and predict which voters are least likely to cast a ballot.

2

The elimination of ballot integrity measures allows election thieves to intercept and replace thousands of ballots. In numerous states, signature matching and photo ID requirements were routinely ignored by election officials.

3

Political operatives knew well ahead of time exactly which cities would decide this election.

• In a book released at the beginning of 2020, former Obama advisor and campaign manager David Plouffe predicted that the outcome would come down to a “block by block” effort to turn out voters in cities such as Philadelphia, Detroit, and Milwaukee.

4

Unprecedented use of mail-in voting creates openings for election meddling.

• Huge numbers of ballots were floating around for weeks prior to Election Day.
• Chain of custody was compromised as these ballots made their way from voters’ hands to counting rooms.

1

A whistleblower who drives a truck for a USPS subcontractor reported that he transported hundreds of thousands of completed ballots from Long Island, New York to Central Pennsylvania on October 21.

• After he arrived at his destination, the entire trailer mysteriously vanished, with the ballots still inside.
• The driver experienced a number of suspicious anomalies — so many that they can only be plausibly explained by a coordinated effort to transport fraudulent ballots across state lines.

2

Another whistleblower, who worked for a USPS subcontractor in Wisconsin, reported being told that postal workers had been instructed to “find” 100,000 “undelivered” ballots after Election Day.

• He was also told by two different USPS employees, on two separate occasions, that they had been ordered to backdate ballots that arrived on November 4 and 5 to make it appear as though the ballots had arrived by Election Day.

3

Early in the morning on November 4 — many hours after the polls had closed and ballot drop boxes were required to be emptied — numerous states had unexplained “dumps” involving tens or hundreds of thousands of ballots arriving at counting centers.

1

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg donated $400 million — the same amount that the federal government allocated for COVID-related election expenses — to leftist organizations.

• $350 million went to the Center for Tech and Civic Life, which distributed the money to local election officials in the form of grants that imposed strict conditions on the conduct of elections, including mandating the number of ballot drop boxes and polling places. The grant money primarily went toward paying the salaries of election workers and financing the purchase of voting equipment.
• Prior to writing his book, A Citizen’s Guide to Beating Donald Trump, David Plouffe had worked as Zuckerberg’s chief advisor for “policy and advocacy” efforts.

1

After Election Day, suspicious and anomalous data began disappearing from state voter rolls.

• Entries listing voters with the same first and last names, and middle names taken from the calendar (May, June, July, August, etc.) were erased.

2

Voting machine drives were separated from the paper tapes that could have tied them to specific machines, preventing the data on those drives from being checked against a physical record.

1 -

Find there is similar conduct in swing states that accomplish 1-5 above, overwhelming circumstantial evidence of intent and method.

2 -

Gain access to data and information they can’t fix and persons who for self-interest are willing to speak the truth.

A

Logs.

B

Ballots.

A

Logs.

B

Ballots.

A

Logs.

B

Ballots.

1 -

Find there is similar conduct in swing states that accomplish 1-5 above, overwhelming circumstantial evidence of intent and method.

2 -

Gain access to data and information they can’t fix and persons who for self-interest are willing to speak the truth.